<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Monday</title>
	<atom:link href="http://chrisblakeley.com/2009/11/10/monday/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://chrisblakeley.com/2009/11/10/monday/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 16:26:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin Knott</title>
		<link>http://chrisblakeley.com/2009/11/10/monday/#comment-2487</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Martin Knott]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 11:24:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chrisblakeley.com/?p=4624#comment-2487</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I will tell you why there were no objectors to this Gating Order, at least as far as I am concerned. 
I wrote a reasoned objection to the order to the Council and delivered it by hand (it was during the early threat of postal disruption).
I received no acknowledgement whatsoever; nor did I see any notice of the meeting in the Council published legal items, which I look at in the papers.
Coupled with the fact the posted notices for the proposed closure were not positioned in accordance with the law, this may have been to ensure that users of the footpath in question would not have seen them.
Is this the Council being inept or devious?
In any event it lead them open to complaints of maladministration, which I shall seriously be considering at this point.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I will tell you why there were no objectors to this Gating Order, at least as far as I am concerned.<br />
I wrote a reasoned objection to the order to the Council and delivered it by hand (it was during the early threat of postal disruption).<br />
I received no acknowledgement whatsoever; nor did I see any notice of the meeting in the Council published legal items, which I look at in the papers.<br />
Coupled with the fact the posted notices for the proposed closure were not positioned in accordance with the law, this may have been to ensure that users of the footpath in question would not have seen them.<br />
Is this the Council being inept or devious?<br />
In any event it lead them open to complaints of maladministration, which I shall seriously be considering at this point.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

